Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: zswap: fix global shrinker error handling logic

[Nhat Pham]

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:54 AM Takero Funaki <flintglass@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yes, the `++progress` counts both error and success as an iteration
> progress for valid memcgs (not writeback amount). Incrementing only on
> success will overly increment failures counter if there is only one
> memcg, one from writeback failure and one from tree walk ends, the
> worker aborts on 8 failures instead of 16.
> `++candidates;` would be better? replacing the name and fixing commit
> messages for v4.

How about `attempt` or `attempted`? Naming is hard :)