Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] drivers/thermal/exynos: improve sanitize_temp_error
From: Sam Protsenko
Date: Fri Jul 26 2024 - 14:27:50 EST
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:01 AM Mateusz Majewski
<m.majewski2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There are two minor issues regarding this function.
>
> One is that it attempts to calculate the second calibration value even
> if 1-point trimming is being used; in this case, the calculated value is
> probably not useful and is never used anyway. Changing this also
> requires a minor reordering in Exynos5433 initialization function, so
> that we know which type of trimming is used before we call
> sanitize_temp_error.
>
> The second issue is that the function is not very consistent when it
> comes to the use of Exynos7-specific parameters. This seems to not be an
> issue in practice, in part because some of these issues are related to
> the mentioned calculation of the second calibration value. However,
> fixing this makes the code a bit less confusing, and will be required
> for Exynos850 which has 9-bit temperature values and uses 2-point
> trimming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> v1 -> v2: reworked to change shift instead of only mask and to also fix
> the 2-point trimming issue.
>
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index b68e9755c933..087a09628e23 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@
> #define EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON 0x160
>
> #define EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_MASK 0x1ff
> +#define EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_SHIFT 9
> #define EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT 23
> #define EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT 0
> #define EXYNOS7_EMUL_DATA_SHIFT 7
> @@ -234,20 +235,23 @@ static void sanitize_temp_error(struct exynos_tmu_data *data, u32 trim_info)
> u16 tmu_temp_mask =
> (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) ? EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_MASK
> : EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
> + int tmu_85_shift =
> + (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) ? EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_SHIFT
> + : EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_85_SHIFT;
>
> data->temp_error1 = trim_info & tmu_temp_mask;
> - data->temp_error2 = ((trim_info >> EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_85_SHIFT) &
> - EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK);
> -
> if (!data->temp_error1 ||
> (data->min_efuse_value > data->temp_error1) ||
> (data->temp_error1 > data->max_efuse_value))
> - data->temp_error1 = data->efuse_value & EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
> + data->temp_error1 = data->efuse_value & tmu_temp_mask;
>
> - if (!data->temp_error2)
> - data->temp_error2 =
> - (data->efuse_value >> EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_85_SHIFT) &
> - EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
> + if (data->cal_type == TYPE_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING) {
> + data->temp_error2 = (trim_info >> tmu_85_shift) & tmu_temp_mask;
> + if (!data->temp_error2)
> + data->temp_error2 =
> + (data->efuse_value >> tmu_85_shift) &
> + tmu_temp_mask;
> + }
> }
>
> static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -510,7 +514,6 @@ static void exynos5433_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int sensor_id, cal_type;
>
> trim_info = readl(data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_TRIMINFO);
> - sanitize_temp_error(data, trim_info);
>
> /* Read the temperature sensor id */
> sensor_id = (trim_info & EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_MASK)
> @@ -532,6 +535,8 @@ static void exynos5433_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
> break;
> }
>
> + sanitize_temp_error(data, trim_info);
> +
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Calibration type is %d-point calibration\n",
> cal_type ? 2 : 1);
> }
> --
> 2.45.1
>