[PATCH v2 2/6] drivers/thermal/exynos: use pm_sleep_ptr instead of conditional compilation
From: Mateusz Majewski
Date: Fri Jul 26 2024 - 07:02:35 EST
Slightly simpler and nothing is lost if _suspend and _resume functions
are built unconditionally.
Suggested-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index 9b7ca93a72f1..b68e9755c933 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -1132,7 +1132,6 @@ static void exynos_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_unprepare(data->clk_sec);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
static int exynos_tmu_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
exynos_tmu_control(to_platform_device(dev), false);
@@ -1152,15 +1151,11 @@ static int exynos_tmu_resume(struct device *dev)
static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(exynos_tmu_pm,
exynos_tmu_suspend, exynos_tmu_resume);
-#define EXYNOS_TMU_PM (&exynos_tmu_pm)
-#else
-#define EXYNOS_TMU_PM NULL
-#endif
static struct platform_driver exynos_tmu_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "exynos-tmu",
- .pm = EXYNOS_TMU_PM,
+ .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&exynos_tmu_pm),
.of_match_table = exynos_tmu_match,
},
.probe = exynos_tmu_probe,
--
2.45.1