Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] drivers/thermal/exynos: use pm_sleep_ptr instead of conditional compilation

[Sam Protsenko]

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:01 AM Mateusz Majewski
<m.majewski2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Slightly simpler and nothing is lost if _suspend and _resume functions
> are built unconditionally.
>
> Suggested-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 9b7ca93a72f1..b68e9755c933 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -1132,7 +1132,6 @@ static void exynos_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 clk_unprepare(data->clk_sec);
>  }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  static int exynos_tmu_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         exynos_tmu_control(to_platform_device(dev), false);
> @@ -1152,15 +1151,11 @@ static int exynos_tmu_resume(struct device *dev)
>
>  static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(exynos_tmu_pm,
>                                 exynos_tmu_suspend, exynos_tmu_resume);
> -#define EXYNOS_TMU_PM  (&exynos_tmu_pm)
> -#else
> -#define EXYNOS_TMU_PM  NULL
> -#endif
>
>  static struct platform_driver exynos_tmu_driver = {
>         .driver = {
>                 .name   = "exynos-tmu",
> -               .pm     = EXYNOS_TMU_PM,
> +               .pm     = pm_sleep_ptr(&exynos_tmu_pm),
>                 .of_match_table = exynos_tmu_match,
>         },
>         .probe = exynos_tmu_probe,
> --
> 2.45.1
>