Re: [PATCH] power: sequencing: pwrseq-qcom-wcn: Depend on WCN36XX

[Andrew Halaney]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 10:12:27AM GMT, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 6:28 PM Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This driver does sequencing for the hardware driven by WCN36XX, let's
> > make it depend on that. Without WCN36XX, we're sequencing power for
> > nothing.
> >
> > Fixes: 2f1630f437df ("power: pwrseq: add a driver for the PMU module on the QCom WCN chipsets")
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > I *think* this makes sense, but if you disagree please let me know. I
> > was sorting out configs in fedora and noticed this was being asked for
> > builds that didn't have WCN36XX enabled, which seems odd to me at least.
> > ---
> >  drivers/power/sequencing/Kconfig | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/power/sequencing/Kconfig b/drivers/power/sequencing/Kconfig
> > index c9f1cdb665248..a4765cb33a80e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/power/sequencing/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/power/sequencing/Kconfig
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ if POWER_SEQUENCING
> >  config POWER_SEQUENCING_QCOM_WCN
> >         tristate "Qualcomm WCN family PMU driver"
> >         default m if ARCH_QCOM
> > +       depends on WCN36XX
> >         help
> >           Say Y here to enable the power sequencing driver for Qualcomm
> >           WCN Bluetooth/WLAN chipsets.
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: 2347b4c79f5e6cd3f4996e80c2d3c15f53006bf5
> > change-id: 20240725-pwrseq-wcn-config-0b6668b5c620
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> 
> What if we want to disable the WLAN driver but keep the Bluetooth
> driver enabled?
> 

Should we:

    depends on WCN36XX || UKNOWN_TO_ANDREW_BLUETOOTH_CONFIG

or, would you rather base it on something else, or nothing at all? I
don't have any hill to die on here, but I wasn't really sure what to
set this config option to for arches outside of aarch64 and was hoping
some Kconfig dependencies could make that more clear.

I'm a little unsure about what the WCN family of hardware is, so I don't
know if that's something we could gate behind a different config more
intelligently (say just ARCH_QCOM if it only makes sense as part of a
Qualcomm SoC itself... not sure how this hardware is sold).

Please let me know your thoughts!

Thanks,
Andrew