Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] reset: mchp: sparx5: Allow building as a module
From: Steen Hegelund
Date: Wed Aug 07 2024 - 05:17:13 EST
Hi Herve,
On Mon, 2024-08-05 at 12:17 +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> From: Clément Léger <clement.leger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This reset controller can be used by the LAN966x PCI device.
>
> The LAN966x PCI device driver can be built as a module and this reset
> controller driver has no reason to be a builtin driver in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/reset/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> index 5b5a4d99616e..88350aa8a51c 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ config RESET_LPC18XX
> This enables the reset controller driver for NXP
> LPC18xx/43xx SoCs.
>
> config RESET_MCHP_SPARX5
> - bool "Microchip Sparx5 reset driver"
> + tristate "Microchip Sparx5 reset driver"
> depends on ARCH_SPARX5 || SOC_LAN966 || MCHP_LAN966X_PCI ||
> COMPILE_TEST
> default y if SPARX5_SWITCH
> select MFD_SYSCON
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c
> b/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c
> index 636e85c388b0..69915c7b4941 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> mchp_sparx5_reset_of_match[] = {
> },
> { }
> };
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mchp_sparx5_reset_of_match);
>
> static struct platform_driver mchp_sparx5_reset_driver = {
> .probe = mchp_sparx5_reset_probe,
> @@ -180,3 +181,4 @@ postcore_initcall(mchp_sparx5_reset_init);
>
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Microchip Sparx5 switch reset driver");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> 2.45.0
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
BR
Steen