Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] media: i2c: imx290: Avoid communication during probe()

[Benjamin Bara]

Hi Laurent!

On Mon, 2 Sept 2024 at 22:00, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 05:57:30PM +0200, bbara93@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > As we don't know the mode during probe(), it doesn't make sense to
> > update the sensors' registers with assumptions. Avoid the communication
> > in this case.
>
> That doesn't seem right. I think you can fix the problem by
> moving initialization of the controls at probe time after the device
> gets runtime-suspended. Please try it, and if it doesn't work, let's
> figure out why.

Will do for the next iteration.

Thanks & kind regards
Benjamin

> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes since v2:
> > - new
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> > index ece4d66001f5..9610e9fd2059 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> > @@ -769,6 +769,10 @@ static int imx290_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> >       if (!pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(imx290->dev))
> >               return 0;
> >
> > +     /* V4L2 controls values will be applied only when mode is known */
> > +     if (imx290->current_mode == &imx290_mode_off)
> > +             return 0;
> > +
> >       state = v4l2_subdev_get_locked_active_state(&imx290->sd);
> >       format = v4l2_subdev_state_get_format(state, 0);
> >
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart