Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] media: i2c: imx290: Avoid communication during probe()

[Laurent Pinchart]

On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 05:57:30PM +0200, bbara93@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> As we don't know the mode during probe(), it doesn't make sense to
> update the sensors' registers with assumptions. Avoid the communication
> in this case.

That doesn't seem right. I think you can fix the problem by
moving initialization of the controls at probe time after the device
gets runtime-suspended. Please try it, and if it doesn't work, let's
figure out why.

> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - new
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> index ece4d66001f5..9610e9fd2059 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> @@ -769,6 +769,10 @@ static int imx290_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
>  	if (!pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(imx290->dev))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/* V4L2 controls values will be applied only when mode is known */
> +	if (imx290->current_mode == &imx290_mode_off)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	state = v4l2_subdev_get_locked_active_state(&imx290->sd);
>  	format = v4l2_subdev_state_get_format(state, 0);
>  

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart