Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t.

[Jens Axboe]

On 9/6/24 8:14 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this is follow up to the previous posting, making the lock
> unconditionally. The original problem with bit spinlock is that it
> disabled preemption and the following operations (within the atomic
> section) perform operations that may sleep on PREEMPT_RT. Mike expressed
> that he would like to keep using zram on PREEMPT_RT.

Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Jens Axboe