Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t.

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Fri Sep 06 2024 - 10:49:09 EST


On 2024-09-06 08:31:23 [-0600], Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/6/24 8:14 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is follow up to the previous posting, making the lock
> > unconditionally. The original problem with bit spinlock is that it
> > disabled preemption and the following operations (within the atomic
> > section) perform operations that may sleep on PREEMPT_RT. Mike expressed
> > that he would like to keep using zram on PREEMPT_RT.
>
> Looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Thank you.
This is routed via your tree, right?

Sebastian