Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t.

[Jens Axboe]

On 9/6/24 8:48 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-09-06 08:31:23 [-0600], Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 9/6/24 8:14 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this is follow up to the previous posting, making the lock
>>> unconditionally. The original problem with bit spinlock is that it
>>> disabled preemption and the following operations (within the atomic
>>> section) perform operations that may sleep on PREEMPT_RT. Mike expressed
>>> that he would like to keep using zram on PREEMPT_RT.
>>
>> Looks good to me:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Thank you.
> This is routed via your tree, right?

I can certainly take it - Minchan let me know if you have concerns.

-- 
Jens Axboe