RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Do not open code read_poll_timeout

[Avri Altman]

> Has it been considered to remove the ufshcd_wait_for_register() function and
> to use read_poll_timeout() directly in the
> ufshcd_wait_for_register() callers? The above patch makes
> ufshcd_wait_for_register() so short that it's probably better to remove this
> function entirely.
Yes - I thought about it.
I think that the wait_for_register makes it much clearer what the function actually does,
And for that reason, only, it worth keeping the function name.
However, if it’s a must I can remove it as you suggested.

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.