Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: th1520: Convert to thp->mutex to guarded mutex

[Markus Elfring]

> Convert th1520_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map() to use guarded mutex for
> thp->mutex.

How does the proposed usage of the programming interface “for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped”
fit to such a change description?

Would you like to omit the first word “to” from the summary phrase?


Would you generally like to increase the application of scope-based resource management
(also in this software area)?

Regards,
Markus