Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: th1520: Convert to thp->mutex to guarded mutex

From: Drew Fustini
Date: Sat Oct 05 2024 - 20:16:42 EST


On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 09:43:06PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 05/10/2024 à 21:35, Drew Fustini a écrit :
> > Convert th1520_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map() to use guarded mutex for
> > thp->mutex.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <dfustini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-th1520.c | 8 +++-----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-th1520.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-th1520.c
> > index 9331f4462480..d03a0a34220a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-th1520.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-th1520.c
> > @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static int th1520_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > int ret;
> > nmaps = 0;
> > - for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> > + for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
>
> Using _scoped iterator is not described in the commit message.
> Is it expected to be part of this patch?

Yes, it was intentional, but you are right that I should have
highlighted that. I'll make it a separate patch.

>
> If yes, the "of_node_put(child);" just a few lines below should be removed.

Thanks, will do.

>
> > int npins = of_property_count_strings(child, "pins");
> > if (npins <= 0) {
> > @@ -444,8 +444,8 @@ static int th1520_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > nmaps = 0;
> > - mutex_lock(&thp->mutex);
> > - for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> > + guard(mutex)(&thp->mutex);
> > + for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
>
> Same here...
>
> > unsigned int rollback = nmaps;
> > enum th1520_muxtype muxtype;
> > struct property *prop;
> > @@ -530,7 +530,6 @@ static int th1520_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > *maps = map;
> > *num_maps = nmaps;
> > - mutex_unlock(&thp->mutex);
> > return 0;
> > free_configs:
> > @@ -538,7 +537,6 @@ static int th1520_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > put_child:
> > of_node_put(child);
>
> ... this should be removed, and maybe the label renamed.

Thanks, will do.

Drew