Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute

[zhang warden]

> On Oct 3, 2024, at 23:25, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 10:59:11PM +0800, zhang warden wrote:
>>> This attribute specifies the sequence in which live patch modules
>>> are applied to the system. If multiple live patches modify the same
>>> function, the implementation with the highest stack order is used,
>>> unless a transition is currently in progress.
>> 
>> This description looks good to me. What's the suggestion of 
>> other maintainers ?
> 
> I like it, though "highest stack order" is still a bit arbitrary, since
> the highest stack order is actually the lowest number.
> 
> -- 
> Josh

How about:

This attribute specifies the sequence in which live patch module 
are applied to the system. If multiple live patches modify the same
function, the implementation with the biggest 'stack_order' number
is used, unless a transition is currently in progress.

Regards.
Wardenjohn.