Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: rng: add st,stm32mp25-rng support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 07/10/2024 15:27, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
> Add RNG STM32MP25x platforms compatible. Update the clock
> properties management to support all versions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>

You CC-ed an address, which suggests you do not work on mainline kernel
or you do not use get_maintainers.pl/b4/patman. Regardless of the
reason, process needs improvement: please CC correct address.

> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml | 41 +++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml
> index 340d01d481d1..c92ce92b6ac9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml
> @@ -18,12 +18,19 @@ properties:
>      enum:
>        - st,stm32-rng
>        - st,stm32mp13-rng
> +      - st,stm32mp25-rng
>  
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
>    clocks:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +
> +  clock-names:

Missing minItems

> +    items:
> +      - const: rng_clk
> +      - const: rng_hclk

Drop _clk and come with some reasonable names, e.g. "core" and "bus"?

>  
>    resets:
>      maxItems: 1
> @@ -57,15 +64,43 @@ allOf:
>        properties:
>          st,rng-lock-conf: false
>  
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - st,stm32mp25-rng
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        clocks:
> +          description: >
> +            RNG bus clock must be named "rng_hclk". The RNG kernel clock
> +            must be named "rng_clk".

Drop description, useless.

Missing minItems

> +          maxItems: 2
> +      required:
> +        - clock-names
> +    else:
> +      properties:
> +        clocks:
> +          maxItems: 1

Missing constrain for clock-names.

> +
>  additionalProperties: false
>  
>  examples:
>    - |
> -    #include <dt-bindings/clock/stm32mp1-clks.h>

Why?

>      rng@54003000 {
>        compatible = "st,stm32-rng";
>        reg = <0x54003000 0x400>;
> -      clocks = <&rcc RNG1_K>;
> +      clocks = <&rcc 124>;

Why?


>      };
>  
> +  - |
> +    rng: rng@42020000 {
> +      compatible = "st,stm32mp25-rng";
> +      reg = <0x42020000 0x400>;
> +      clocks = <&clk_rcbsec>, <&rcc 110>;
> +      clock-names = "rng_clk", "rng_hclk";
> +      resets = <&rcc 97>;
> +      access-controllers = <&rifsc 92>;


Difference in one property should not need new example, usually.

Best regards,
Krzysztof