Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ocfs2: adjust spinlock_t ip_lock protection scope

From: Joseph Qi
Date: Tue Oct 08 2024 - 03:36:05 EST


This is a standalone cleanup, so please send in a separate thread.

Thanks,
Joseph

On 9/8/24 10:07 PM, Heming Zhao wrote:
> Some of the spinlock_t ip_lock protection scopes are incorrect and
> should follow the usage in 'struct ocfs2_inode_info'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Su Yue <glass.su@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 3 ++-
> fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 5 +++--
> fs/ocfs2/resize.c | 4 ++--
> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> index da78a04d6f0b..4a5900c8dc8f 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> @@ -2232,6 +2232,8 @@ static int ocfs2_refresh_inode_from_lvb(struct inode *inode)
> else
> inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode);
>
> + spin_unlock(&oi->ip_lock);
> +
> i_uid_write(inode, be32_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_iuid));
> i_gid_write(inode, be32_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_igid));
> inode->i_mode = be16_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_imode);
> @@ -2242,7 +2244,6 @@ static int ocfs2_refresh_inode_from_lvb(struct inode *inode)
> inode_set_mtime_to_ts(inode, ts);
> ocfs2_unpack_timespec(&ts, be64_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_ictime_packed));
> inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, ts);
> - spin_unlock(&oi->ip_lock);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> index 2cc5c99fe941..4af9a6dfddd2 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> @@ -1348,14 +1348,15 @@ void ocfs2_refresh_inode(struct inode *inode,
> inode->i_blocks = 0;
> else
> inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode);
> +
> + spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_lock);
> +
> inode_set_atime(inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_atime),
> le32_to_cpu(fe->i_atime_nsec));
> inode_set_mtime(inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_mtime),
> le32_to_cpu(fe->i_mtime_nsec));
> inode_set_ctime(inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_ctime),
> le32_to_cpu(fe->i_ctime_nsec));
> -
> - spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_lock);
> }
>
> int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
> index c4a4016d3866..b29f71357d63 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
> @@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ static int ocfs2_update_last_group_and_inode(handle_t *handle,
>
> spin_lock(&OCFS2_I(bm_inode)->ip_lock);
> OCFS2_I(bm_inode)->ip_clusters = le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters);
> - le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)new_clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
> spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(bm_inode)->ip_lock);
> + le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)new_clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
> i_size_write(bm_inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size));
>
> ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, bm_bh);
> @@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input)
>
> spin_lock(&OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_lock);
> OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_clusters = le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters);
> - le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)input->clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
> spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_lock);
> + le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)input->clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
> i_size_write(main_bm_inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size));
>
> ocfs2_update_super_and_backups(main_bm_inode, input->clusters);
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> index 9e847f59c9ef..3f91615d8702 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> @@ -798,9 +798,9 @@ static int ocfs2_block_group_alloc(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>
> spin_lock(&OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_lock);
> OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_clusters = le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters);
> + spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_lock);
> fe->i_size = cpu_to_le64(ocfs2_clusters_to_bytes(alloc_inode->i_sb,
> le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters)));
> - spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_lock);
> i_size_write(alloc_inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size));
> alloc_inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(alloc_inode);
> ocfs2_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, alloc_inode, 0);