Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ocfs2: adjust spinlock_t ip_lock protection scope

[Heming Zhao]

On 10/8/24 15:18, Joseph Qi wrote:
> This is a standalone cleanup, so please send in a separate thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Joseph

No problem.

-Heming

> On 9/8/24 10:07 PM, Heming Zhao wrote:
> > Some of the spinlock_t ip_lock protection scopes are incorrect and
> > should follow the usage in 'struct ocfs2_inode_info'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Su Yue <glass.su@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c  | 3 ++-
> >   fs/ocfs2/inode.c    | 5 +++--
> >   fs/ocfs2/resize.c   | 4 ++--
> >   fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 2 +-
> >   4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> > index da78a04d6f0b..4a5900c8dc8f 100644
> > --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> > @@ -2232,6 +2232,8 @@ static int ocfs2_refresh_inode_from_lvb(struct inode *inode)
> >   	else
> >   		inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode);
> > ... ...