Re: [PATCH] rust: query the compiler for dylib path

[Tamir Duberstein]

On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 10:20 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In particular, there were some patches NAK'd with arguments that may
> apply here (e.g. extra process spawns).

Understood. My guess is nobody will care about the process spawn in
scripts/generate_rust_analyzer.py. Someone might care about the one in
rust/Makefile, but there are already 4 others. By the way, I notice those are
using $(shell ...) - should I be using that form as well?

> Moreover, how will it get tested going forward? (e.g. currently I
> can't, but I could look into setting something up if the kernel wants
> to support this). If it breaks, is it considered a bug? etc.

I guess that's not for me to say. It would be great to have basic automation.

> > Thanks Miguel! As this is my first patch, please let me know if further action
> > is required.
>
> You're welcome! Yes, a new version would be needed with the proper
> tags/authorship, but first we should probably wait to hear what Kbuild
> (or the kernel) thinks.
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel

> Please read the section of the documentation I linked, it contains an
> example on how this should be done, i.e. the Co-developed-by tag
> cannot be on its own:

My apologies for the oversight.