Re: [PATCH] rust: query the compiler for dylib path

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 4:48 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Understood. My guess is nobody will care about the process spawn in
> scripts/generate_rust_analyzer.py. Someone might care about the one in
> rust/Makefile, but there are already 4 others. By the way, I notice those are

Yeah, I was referring to the `Makefile` one (the other one, indeed,
does not matter, as you say).

> using $(shell ...) - should I be using that form as well?

Hmm... I assume you tested the patch, but how would the patch work
without it? Or am I confused?

> I guess that's not for me to say. It would be great to have basic automation.

Generally, when submitting a new feature for upstream, especially one
that requires new testing, it is common that the submitter is asked to
take care of it or help doing so. I guess, in this case, Daniel is the
one handling the macOS support out-of-tree.

Anyway, we may need to use variables for this, so I think it is fine
-- upstream can keep the variable working easily, and out-of-tree can
test the overall macOS support.

> My apologies for the oversight.

No worries, thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel