Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fix spelling error in remoteproc.rst

[Everest K.C.]

On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 9:54 AM Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> This is a case of old english vs. new english.  Using "implementors" is still
> correct.  Moreover, there are 33 instances of the word "implementor" in the
> kernel tree.  Unless there is an effor to change all occurences I will not move
> forward with this patch.
I can work on changing all 33 instances of the word "implementor".
Should I create a patchset for it ?
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:15:57AM -0600, Everest K.C. wrote:
> > Following spelling error reported by codespell
> > was fixed:
> >       implementors ==> implementers
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Everest K.C. <everestkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
> > index 348ee7e508ac..5c226fa076d6 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
> > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Typical usage
> >       rproc_shutdown(my_rproc);
> >    }
> >
> > -API for implementors
> > +API for implementers
> >  ====================
> >
> >  ::
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
Thanks,
Everest K.C.