Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fix spelling error in remoteproc.rst

[Jonathan Corbet]

"Everest K.C." <everestkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 9:54 AM Mathieu Poirier
> <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> This is a case of old english vs. new english.  Using "implementors" is still
>> correct.  Moreover, there are 33 instances of the word "implementor" in the
>> kernel tree.  Unless there is an effor to change all occurences I will not move
>> forward with this patch.
> I can work on changing all 33 instances of the word "implementor".
> Should I create a patchset for it ?

Honestly, given that "implementor" is correct, this really doesn't seem
like it is worth the effort and churn.

jon