Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fix spelling error in remoteproc.rst

[Everest K.C.]

On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:06 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> "Everest K.C." <everestkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 9:54 AM Mathieu Poirier
> > <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Good morning,
> >>
> >> This is a case of old english vs. new english.  Using "implementors" is still
> >> correct.  Moreover, there are 33 instances of the word "implementor" in the
> >> kernel tree.  Unless there is an effor to change all occurences I will not move
> >> forward with this patch.
> > I can work on changing all 33 instances of the word "implementor".
> > Should I create a patchset for it ?
>
> Honestly, given that "implementor" is correct, this really doesn't seem
> like it is worth the effort and churn.
Noted.
> jon

With Regards,
Everest K.C.