Re: [PATCH 2/2] maple_tree: Add some alloc node test case
From: Wei Yang
Date: Thu Oct 10 2024 - 21:18:14 EST
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 12:06:31PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>From: Jiazi Li <jqqlijiazi@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>Add some maple_tree alloc node tese case.
>
>Suggested-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Jiazi Li <jqqlijiazi@xxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
>index 11f1efdf83f9..b4b5fd9f294d 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
>+++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
>@@ -462,6 +462,28 @@ static noinline void __init check_new_node(struct maple_tree *mt)
> MT_BUG_ON(mt, mas_allocated(&mas) != 10 + MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS - 1);
> mas_destroy(&mas);
>
>+ mas.node = MA_ERROR(-ENOMEM);
>+ mas_node_count(&mas, MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS + 1); /* Request */
>+ mas_nomem(&mas, GFP_KERNEL); /* Fill request */
I am not sure why mas_nomem() is here.
Without this one, we still can trigger the original bug.
>+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, mas_allocated(&mas) != MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS + 1);
>+ mas.node = MA_ERROR(-ENOMEM);
>+ mas_node_count(&mas, MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS * 2 + 2); /* Request */
>+ mas_nomem(&mas, GFP_KERNEL); /* Fill request */
>+ mas.status = ma_start;
>+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, mas_allocated(&mas) != MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS * 2 + 2);
>+ mas_destroy(&mas);
>+
>+ mas.node = MA_ERROR(-ENOMEM);
>+ mas_node_count(&mas, MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS * 2 + 1); /* Request */
>+ mas_nomem(&mas, GFP_KERNEL); /* Fill request */
>+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, mas_allocated(&mas) != MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS * 2 + 1);
>+ mas.node = MA_ERROR(-ENOMEM);
>+ mas_node_count(&mas, MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS * 3 + 2); /* Request */
>+ mas_nomem(&mas, GFP_KERNEL); /* Fill request */
>+ mas.status = ma_start;
>+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, mas_allocated(&mas) != MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS * 3 + 2);
>+ mas_destroy(&mas);
>+
> mtree_unlock(mt);
> }
>
>--
>2.43.0
>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me