Re: [PATCHv6 bpf-next 15/16] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to consumer test
From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Fri Oct 11 2024 - 07:36:58 EST
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 07:30:19PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:13 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Adding uprobe session consumers to the consumer test,
> > so we get the session into the test mix.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 63 +++++++++++++++----
> > .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c | 16 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
>
> you are undoing most of the changes done in the previous patch... it
> seems like it would be better to just combine both patches
ok, the diff looks actualy ok, I'll squash them together
thanks,
jirka
>
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> > index 2effe4d693b4..df9314309bc3 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> > @@ -761,6 +761,10 @@ get_program(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int prog)
> > return skel->progs.uprobe_0;
> > case 1:
> > return skel->progs.uprobe_1;
> > + case 2:
> > + return skel->progs.uprobe_2;
> > + case 3:
> > + return skel->progs.uprobe_3;
> > default:
> > ASSERT_FAIL("get_program");
> > return NULL;
>
> [...]