Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] rtc: pm8xxx: implement qcom,no-alarm flag for non-HLOS owned alarm

[Johan Hovold]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 09:12:08AM -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote:
> On 10/16/24 9:02 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>>>    	int alarm_irq;
> >>>>    	const struct pm8xxx_rtc_regs *regs;
> >>>>    	struct device *dev;
> >>>> @@ -473,9 +474,14 @@ static int pm8xxx_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>    	if (!rtc_dd->regmap)
> >>>>    		return -ENXIO;
> >>>>    
> >>>> -	rtc_dd->alarm_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> >>>> -	if (rtc_dd->alarm_irq < 0)
> >>>> -		return -ENXIO;
> >>>> +	rtc_dd->no_alarm = of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node,
> >>>> +						 "qcom,no-alarm");
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Stray newline.
> >>
> >> That's not a stray newline?
> > 
> > There was no empty line between the assignment and check before this
> > change, but now there is even though there should not be.
> 
> There was no empty line between the "alarm_irq" assignment and check, 
> and there still isn't. That empty line separating the new 
> of_property_read_bool() line.

Ah, sorry, my bad.

> I could move both of_property_read_bool() lines together to make it look 
> better.

Yeah, that sounds like a good idea.

Johan