Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: count zeromap read and set for swapout and swapin

[Nhat Pham]

On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 7:32 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> agree it is better to have a separate counter for zeromap.
> then it raises a question: what is the proper name for it :-)
>
> zeromap_swpin, zeromap_swpout seems too long? and zswpin
> and zswpout have been used by zswap

Hmmmmm. How about zeroswpin? zeroswpout?

zeromap_swpin and zeromap_swpout is not the end of the world, FWIW :)