Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: count zeromap read and set for swapout and swapin

[David Hildenbrand]

On 28.10.24 17:34, Nhat Pham wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 7:32 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > agree it is better to have a separate counter for zeromap.
> > then it raises a question: what is the proper name for it :-)
> >
> > zeromap_swpin, zeromap_swpout seems too long? and zswpin
> > and zswpout have been used by zswap
>
> Hmmmmm. How about zeroswpin? zeroswpout?

Is this kind of a "swpin_skip" / "swpout_skip" ? Because we optimized it 
out?

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb