Hi Rafael,
On 10/29/24 18:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:43 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_update_performance_limits);
It would be good to have at least one caller of this function in the tree.
Yes, I know, but we had delays with the SCMI cpufreq to get the
notifications support, which are sent from FW...
The patch using this API was part of v1 but with assumption that
those SCMI notifications are merged.
The patch v1 for the SCMI cpufreq driver [1].
In that v1 cover letter I mentioned that the 2nd patch depends
on notifications [2].
I will have to work with Cristian on that notification in SCMI
then this API will be used. I can see that it stuck for a while
in v5. Let me sort that out (probably not in this merge window
though).
Can we do it this way?
Regards,
Lukasz
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240403162315.1458337-3-lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240403162315.1458337-1-lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240603192654.2167620-1-quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx/