RE: [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] Direct Map Removal for guest_memfd

[Manwaring, Derek]

On 2024-11-04 at 08:33+0000, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> This statement *is* for integrity section. We have a separate TDX guidance
> on side-channels (including speculative) [3] and some speculative attacks
> that affect confidentiality (for example spectre v1) are listed as not covered
> by TDX but remaining SW responsibility (as they are now).

Thanks for the additional info, Elena. Given that clarification, I
definitely see direct map removal and TDX as complementary.

Derek