Re: [RFC net-next (resend) 3/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: handle member-violations

[Andrew Lunn]

> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/switchdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/switchdev.c
> @@ -79,5 +79,36 @@ int mv88e6xxx_handle_miss_violation(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
>  				       brport, &info.info, NULL);
>  	rtnl_unlock();
>  
> -	return err;
> +	return notifier_to_errno(err);
> +}

This change does not look obviously correct to me. What has a miss
violation got to do with member violation? Is the existing code wrong?
What about the case when mv88e6xxx_find_vid() returns an error?

	Andrew