Re: [RFC net-next (resend) 3/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: handle member-violations
From: Elliot Ayrey
Date: Sun Nov 10 2024 - 23:39:32 EST
On Fri, 2024-11-08 at 14:49 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/switchdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/switchdev.c
> > @@ -79,5 +79,36 @@ int mv88e6xxx_handle_miss_violation(struct
> > mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
> > brport,
> > &http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=20988&d=jZeu528qsdfVmICHdkZAoueog
> > WLEwsN_Wa_RILla0Q&u=http%3a%2f%2finfo%2einfo NULL);
> > rtnl_unlock();
> >
> > - return err;
> > + return notifier_to_errno(err);
> > +}
>
> This change does not look obviously correct to me. What has a miss
> violation got to do with member violation? Is the existing code
> wrong?
> What about the case when mv88e6xxx_find_vid() returns an error?
>
> Andrew
Hi Andrew, I forgot to remove this when preparing the patches, this was
intended to be a separate bug fix.
If mv88e6xxx_find_vid() returns an error it will return early, so the
notifier_to_errno() conversion will only happen after
call_switchdev_notifiers().