RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Do not hold any lock in ufshcd_hba_stop

[Avri Altman]

> Shouldn't the ufshcd_enable_irq() call be moved below the
> ufshcd_wait_for_register() call? Otherwise a race condition could cause the
> interrupt handler to be triggered while the controller is being disabled.
Correct.
if ufshcd_enable_irq() is called before the controller is fully disabled, it could allow interrupts to occur prematurely.
Will move it.

Thanks,
Avri
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.