Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] dt-bindings: net: Add TI DP83TD510 10BaseT1L PHY
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Fri Dec 06 2024 - 11:57:17 EST
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 09:10:14AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 05:18:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:56:36PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > Introduce devicetree binding for the Texas Instruments DP83TD510
> > > Ultra Low Power 802.3cg 10Base-T1L Single Pair Ethernet PHY.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..cf13e86a4017
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: TI DP83TD510 10BaseT1L PHY
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > + - Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > +
> > > +description:
> > > + DP83TD510E Ultra Low Power 802.3cg 10Base-T1L 10M Single Pair Ethernet PHY
> > > +
> > > +allOf:
> > > + - $ref: ethernet-phy.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + enum:
> > > + - ethernet-phy-id2000.0181
> >
> > There's nothing specific here, can someone remind me why the generic
> > binding is not enough?
>
> The missing binding was blamed by checkpatch. Haw should I proceed with this
> patch?
Does dtbs_check complain when you use it in a dts? What you have here
matches against the pattern ^ethernet-phy-id[a-f0-9]{4}\\.[a-f0-9]{4}$
so I think it won't. checkpatch might be too dumb to evaluate the regex?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature