Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] dt-bindings: net: Add TI DP83TD510 10BaseT1L PHY

[Oleksij Rempel]

On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 04:57:01PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 09:10:14AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 05:18:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:56:36PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > Introduce devicetree binding for the Texas Instruments DP83TD510
> > > > Ultra Low Power 802.3cg 10Base-T1L Single Pair Ethernet PHY.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..cf13e86a4017
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> > > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > > +---
> > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml#
> > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > > +
> > > > +title: TI DP83TD510 10BaseT1L PHY
> > > > +
> > > > +maintainers:
> > > > +  - Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > +
> > > > +description:
> > > > +  DP83TD510E Ultra Low Power 802.3cg 10Base-T1L 10M Single Pair Ethernet PHY
> > > > +
> > > > +allOf:
> > > > +  - $ref: ethernet-phy.yaml#
> > > > +
> > > > +properties:
> > > > +  compatible:
> > > > +    enum:
> > > > +      - ethernet-phy-id2000.0181
> > > 
> > > There's nothing specific here, can someone remind me why the generic
> > > binding is not enough?
> > 
> > The missing binding was blamed by checkpatch. Haw should I proceed with this
> > patch?
> 
> Does dtbs_check complain when you use it in a dts? What you have here
> matches against the pattern ^ethernet-phy-id[a-f0-9]{4}\\.[a-f0-9]{4}$
> so I think it won't. checkpatch might be too dumb to evaluate the regex?

dtbs_check didn't complained about it, only checkpatch.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |