Re: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: userspace: Add fast-switch support for userspace

From: Christian Loehle
Date: Mon Dec 09 2024 - 05:39:04 EST


On 12/9/24 08:14, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> Now, the userspace governor does not support userspace,
> if the driver only use the fast-switch and not add target_index(),

Which driver does that? Is that actually valid?
No mainline driver from what I can see.

> it will cause uerspace not work.

s/uerspace/userspace
to not work?

> So add fast-switch support for userspace governor.
>
> Co-developed-by: Guohua Yan <guohua.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Guohua Yan <guohua.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
> index 2c42fee76daa..3a99197246ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,30 @@ struct userspace_policy {
> struct mutex mutex;
> };
>
> +static int cpufreq_userspace_target_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation)
> +{
> + int ret;

not really necessary

> +
> + if (policy->fast_switch_enabled) {
> + unsigned int idx;
> +
> + target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
> +
> + if (!policy->freq_table)
> + return target_freq;
> +
> + idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
> + policy->cached_resolved_idx = idx;
> + policy->cached_target_freq = target_freq;
> + ret = !cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(policy, policy->freq_table[idx].frequency);
> + } else {
> + ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, target_freq, relation);

NIT: could save the indent if you reverse conditions and ret early on !fast_switch

> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * cpufreq_set - set the CPU frequency
> * @policy: pointer to policy struct where freq is being set
> @@ -41,7 +65,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq)
>
> userspace->setspeed = freq;
>
> - ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> + ret = cpufreq_userspace_target_freq(policy, freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> err:
> mutex_unlock(&userspace->mutex);
> return ret;
> @@ -62,6 +86,8 @@ static int cpufreq_userspace_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> mutex_init(&userspace->mutex);
>
> + cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(policy);
> +
> policy->governor_data = userspace;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -72,6 +98,7 @@ static int cpufreq_userspace_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> */
> static void cpufreq_userspace_policy_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> + cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
> kfree(policy->governor_data);
> policy->governor_data = NULL;
> }
> @@ -112,13 +139,13 @@ static void cpufreq_userspace_policy_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> policy->cpu, policy->min, policy->max, policy->cur, userspace->setspeed);
>
> if (policy->max < userspace->setspeed)
> - __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->max,
> + cpufreq_userspace_target_freq(policy, policy->max,
> CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
> else if (policy->min > userspace->setspeed)
> - __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->min,
> + cpufreq_userspace_target_freq(policy, policy->min,
> CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> else
> - __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, userspace->setspeed,
> + cpufreq_userspace_target_freq(policy, userspace->setspeed,
> CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
>
> mutex_unlock(&userspace->mutex);