Re: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: userspace: Add fast-switch support for userspace

[Xuewen Yan]

On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 6:36 PM Christian Loehle
<christian.loehle@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 12/9/24 08:14, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> > Now, the userspace governor does not support userspace,
> > if the driver only use the fast-switch and not add target_index(),
>
> Which driver does that? Is that actually valid?
> No mainline driver from what I can see.
>

Yes, indeed no mainline driver, It's on our own driver.

> > it will cause uerspace not work.
>
> s/uerspace/userspace
> to not work?
>
> > So add fast-switch support for userspace governor.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Guohua Yan <guohua.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Guohua Yan <guohua.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
> > index 2c42fee76daa..3a99197246ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,30 @@ struct userspace_policy {
> >       struct mutex mutex;
> >  };
> >
> > +static int cpufreq_userspace_target_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > +                     unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation)
> > +{
> > +     int ret;
>
> not really necessary

In cpufreq_set(), we need the return value.

>
> > +
> > +     if (policy->fast_switch_enabled) {
> > +             unsigned int idx;
> > +
> > +             target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
> > +
> > +             if (!policy->freq_table)
> > +                     return target_freq;
> > +
> > +             idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
> > +             policy->cached_resolved_idx = idx;
> > +             policy->cached_target_freq = target_freq;
> > +             ret = !cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(policy, policy->freq_table[idx].frequency);
> > +     } else {
> > +             ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
>
> NIT: could save the indent if you reverse conditions and ret early on !fast_switch

Okay, thanks!

>
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * cpufreq_set - set the CPU frequency
> >   * @policy: pointer to policy struct where freq is being set
> > @@ -41,7 +65,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq)
> >
> >       userspace->setspeed = freq;
> >
> > -     ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> > +     ret = cpufreq_userspace_target_freq(policy, freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> >   err:
> >       mutex_unlock(&userspace->mutex);
> >       return ret;
> > @@ -62,6 +86,8 @@ static int cpufreq_userspace_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >
> >       mutex_init(&userspace->mutex);
> >
> > +     cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(policy);
> > +
> >       policy->governor_data = userspace;
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -72,6 +98,7 @@ static int cpufreq_userspace_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >   */
> >  static void cpufreq_userspace_policy_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >  {
> > +     cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
> >       kfree(policy->governor_data);
> >       policy->governor_data = NULL;
> >  }
> > @@ -112,13 +139,13 @@ static void cpufreq_userspace_policy_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >                policy->cpu, policy->min, policy->max, policy->cur, userspace->setspeed);
> >
> >       if (policy->max < userspace->setspeed)
> > -             __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->max,
> > +             cpufreq_userspace_target_freq(policy, policy->max,
> >                                       CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
> >       else if (policy->min > userspace->setspeed)
> > -             __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->min,
> > +             cpufreq_userspace_target_freq(policy, policy->min,
> >                                       CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> >       else
> > -             __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, userspace->setspeed,
> > +             cpufreq_userspace_target_freq(policy, userspace->setspeed,
> >                                       CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> >
> >       mutex_unlock(&userspace->mutex);
>

BR