Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpu: Expose only stepping min/max interface

[Dave Hansen]

On 12/13/24 08:24, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> 
> And while we're adding new defines, can we shorten them too?
> 
> 	X86_MATCH_VFM_STP(INTEL_ATOM_CRESTMONT,	X86_STP_MIN, X86_STP_MAX, &gnr_cfg),

I did make these:

	X86_STEP_MIN/X86_STEP_MAX

The "STP" looks a little to TLA-ish to me. It's worth the extra byte to
have a real word.