Re: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: scmi: Check fwnode instead of machine compatible

[Sudeep Holla]

On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 04:20:46PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> 
> For the platform that not compatible with scmi pinctrl device, the
> fwnode will not be set, so checking fwnode will make code simpler
> and easy to maintain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c
> index df4bbcd7d1d59ac2c8ddc320dc10d702ad1ed5b2..aade6df77dbb2c391741e77c0aac3f029991e4bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c
> @@ -505,11 +505,6 @@ static int pinctrl_scmi_get_pins(struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static const char * const scmi_pinctrl_blocklist[] = {
> -	"fsl,imx95",
> -	NULL
> -};
> -
>  static int scmi_pinctrl_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -521,7 +516,7 @@ static int scmi_pinctrl_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
>  	if (!sdev->handle)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (of_machine_compatible_match(scmi_pinctrl_blocklist))
> +	if (!dev->fwnode)

I would prefer to see the blocklist to be explicit here rather than
implicitly hiding it away with this change set.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep