Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] i2c: riic: Introduce a separate variable for IRQ

[Lad, Prabhakar]

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the review.

On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 10:48 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 10:19 AM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Refactor the IRQ handling in riic_i2c_probe by introducing a local variable
> > `irq` to store IRQ numbers instead of assigning them to `ret`. This change
> > improves code readability and clarity.
> >
> > Remove explicit error handling after `platform_get_irq()` since
> > `devm_request_irq()` already handles such errors.
>
> Where does it handle such errors?
> I only found the following check in request_threaded_irq():
>
>         desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>         if (!desc)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> Although irq_to_desc() takes an unsigned int, it should indeed catch
> invalid (negative) interrupt numbers, but the code above would not
> propagate the correct error code (e.g. -EPROBE_DEFER).
>
Agreed, I had missed that. I will restore the check.

Cheers,
Prabhakar