[PATCH v5] i2c: riic: Introduce a separate variable for IRQ

[Prabhakar]

From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Refactor the IRQ handling in riic_i2c_probe by introducing a local variable
`irq` to store IRQ numbers instead of assigning them to `ret`. This change
improves code readability and clarity.

Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Note, this patch is part of series [0], as requested by Andi, sending
only patch 1/9 from series [0].

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250103091900.428729-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

v4->v5
- validate return value of platform_get_irq()
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
index 9264adc97ca9..9809ac095710 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
@@ -464,11 +464,13 @@ static int riic_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riic_irqs); i++) {
-		ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, riic_irqs[i].res_num);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			return ret;
+		int irq;
+
+		irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, riic_irqs[i].res_num);
+		if (irq < 0)
+			return irq;
 
-		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, ret, riic_irqs[i].isr,
+		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, riic_irqs[i].isr,
 				       0, riic_irqs[i].name, riic);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to request irq %s\n", riic_irqs[i].name);
-- 
2.43.0