Re: [PATCH 0/8] mm: Remove PG_reclaim

From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Mon Jan 13 2025 - 09:07:55 EST


On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:45:48PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:34:45AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Use PG_dropbehind instead of PG_reclaim and remove PG_reclaim.
>
> I was hoping we'd end up with the name PG_reclaim instead of the name
> PG_dropbehind. PG_reclaim is a better name for this functionality.

I got burned by re-using the name with MAX_ORDER redefinition.
I guess it is less risky as it is less used, but still...

Anyway, it can be done with a patch on top of the patchset. We must get
rid of current PG_reclaim first.

--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov