Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce configfs-based interface for gpio-aggregator

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 7:40 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> While at it: there's no reason to impose a
> naming convention of lineX, lineY etc., the names don't matter for the
> aggregator setup (unlike gpio-sim where they indicate the offset of
> the line they concern).
>

Scratch that part. There's a good reason for that - the ordering of
lines within the aggregator. I'm just not sure whether we should
impose a strict naming where - for an aggregator of 3 lines total - we
expect there to exist groups named line0, line1 and line2 or if we
should be more lenient and possibly sort whatever names the user
provides alphabetically?

Bart