On 2025/2/7 16:50, Hongzhen Luo wrote:
There's no need to enumerate each type. No logic changes.
Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---> v3: Code cleanup, remove logically inequivalent changes.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250207080829.2405528-1-hongzhen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250207064135.2249529-1-hongzhen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
---
fs/erofs/zmap.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/erofs/zmap.c b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
index 689437e99a5a..7dba1573498b 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/zmap.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
@@ -265,23 +265,20 @@ static int z_erofs_extent_lookback(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
if (err)
return err;
- switch (m->type) {
- case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD:
+ if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
+ erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
+ m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
+ DBG_BUGON(1);
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ } else if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD) {
lookback_distance = m->delta[0];
if (!lookback_distance)
goto err_bogus;'
Maybe just kill `goto err_bogus;` too, like:
if (!lookback_distance) {
erofs_err(sb, "bogus lookback distance %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
lookback_distance, m->lcn, vi->nid);
DBG_BUGON(1);
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
}
Otherwise it looks good to me.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang