Re: [PATCH] leds: aw200xx: don't use return with gpiod_set_value() variants

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:59 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> While it now returns void, it will soon be converted to return an
> integer instead. Don't do `return gpiod_set...`.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502121512.CmoMg9Q7-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
> index 08cca128458c..fe223d363a5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static void aw200xx_enable(const struct aw200xx *const chip)
>
>  static void aw200xx_disable(const struct aw200xx *const chip)
>  {
> -       return gpiod_set_value_cansleep(chip->hwen, 0);
> +       gpiod_set_value_cansleep(chip->hwen, 0);
>  }
>
>  static int aw200xx_probe_get_display_rows(struct device *dev,
> --
> 2.45.2
>

Lee, Pavel:

If this is OK for you, can you please provide me with an immutable
branch so that I can pull it into the GPIO tree? It seems it's the
only such use-case in the tree apart from the gpio.h header that I can
fix locally. Alternatively you can just Ack this and let me take it
through the GPIO tree.

Bartosz