Re: [PATCH] leds: aw200xx: don't use return with gpiod_set_value() variants

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:59 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > While it now returns void, it will soon be converted to return an
> > integer instead. Don't do `return gpiod_set...`.
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502121512.CmoMg9Q7-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
> > index 08cca128458c..fe223d363a5d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
> > @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static void aw200xx_enable(const struct aw200xx *const chip)
> >
> >  static void aw200xx_disable(const struct aw200xx *const chip)
> >  {
> > -       return gpiod_set_value_cansleep(chip->hwen, 0);
> > +       gpiod_set_value_cansleep(chip->hwen, 0);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int aw200xx_probe_get_display_rows(struct device *dev,
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
> 
> Lee, Pavel:
> 
> If this is OK for you, can you please provide me with an immutable
> branch so that I can pull it into the GPIO tree? It seems it's the
> only such use-case in the tree apart from the gpio.h header that I can
> fix locally. Alternatively you can just Ack this and let me take it
> through the GPIO tree.

I'm okay with it, but why do you need it?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]