Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip: clocksource: fix jcore-pit irq request

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Daniel,

On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 15:43, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 16/02/2025 18:55, Artur Rojek wrote:
> > The jcore-aic irqchip does not have separate interrupt numbers reserved
> > for cpu-local vs global interrupts. Instead, the task of selecting this
> > property is being delegated to the device drivers requesting the given
> > irq.
> >
> > This quirk has not been taken into account while migrating jcore-pit to
> > request_percpu_irq(), resulting in a failure to register PIT interrupts.
> >
> > Fix this behavior by making the following changes:
> > 1) Explicitly register irq_set_percpu_devid() in jcore-pit.
> > 2) Provide enable_percpu_irq()/disable_percpu_irq() calls in jcore-pit.
> > 3) Make jcore-aic pass the correct per-cpu cookie to the irq handler by
> >     using handle_percpu_devid_irq() instead of handle_percpu_irq().
> >
> > Fixes: 69a9dcbd2d65 ("clocksource/drivers/jcore: Use request_percpu_irq()")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Artur Rojek <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> How this patch should be merged ?
>
> It is touching irqchip and clocksource at the same time.
>
> May I pick it in the clocksource tree ?

Thomas already took it, cfr. commit d7e3fd658248f257
("irqchip/jcore-aic, clocksource/drivers/jcore: Fix jcore-pit interrupt
request") in next-20250219.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds