Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mailbox: tmelite-qmp: Introduce TMEL QMP mailbox driver

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 4.03.2025 10:46 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 10:33, Sricharan Ramabadhran
> <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/3/2025 6:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:58:42PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/28/2025 12:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:23:56AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> +          dev_err(dev, "Failed with status: %d\n", msg.resp.status);
>>>>>> +          ret = msg.resp.status;
>>>>>
>>>>> return msg.resp.status (is it really errno?)
>>>>>
>>>> ok, yes error.
>>>
>>> The question was if it is an errno, not if it is an error.
>> status != 0 is an error always.
> 
> Is it an _errno_ ?

Dmitry's asking whether the status conforms to the Linux's errno.h
ABI. If not, add something like:

ret = msg.resp.status ? -EINVAL : 0

Konrad