Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mailbox: tmelite-qmp: Introduce TMEL QMP mailbox driver

[Sricharan Ramabadhran]

On 3/4/2025 10:16 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 4.03.2025 10:46 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 10:33, Sricharan Ramabadhran
> > <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 3/3/2025 6:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:58:42PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
> > > > > On 2/28/2025 12:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:23:56AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > +          dev_err(dev, "Failed with status: %d\n", msg.resp.status);
> > > > > > > +          ret = msg.resp.status;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > return msg.resp.status (is it really errno?)
> > > > > ok, yes error.
> > > >
> > > > The question was if it is an errno, not if it is an error.
> > > status != 0 is an error always.
> >
> > Is it an _errno_ ?
>
> Dmitry's asking whether the status conforms to the Linux's errno.h
> ABI. If not, add something like:
>
> ret = msg.resp.status ? -EINVAL : 0
Yeah, responded on other thread. It does not, so will add the mapping.

Regards,
Sricharan