[PATCH v2] accel/qaic: Fix integer overflow in qaic_validate_req()

[Dan Carpenter]

These are u64 variables that come from the user via
qaic_attach_slice_bo_ioctl().  Use check_add_overflow() to ensure that
the math doesn't have an integer wrapping bug.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: ff13be830333 ("accel/qaic: Add datapath")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: use check_add_overflow() instead of open coding a check

 drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
index c20eb63750f5..631e401fbe4a 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
@@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ static bool invalid_sem(struct qaic_sem *sem)
 static int qaic_validate_req(struct qaic_device *qdev, struct qaic_attach_slice_entry *slice_ent,
 			     u32 count, u64 total_size)
 {
+	u64 total;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
@@ -563,7 +564,8 @@ static int qaic_validate_req(struct qaic_device *qdev, struct qaic_attach_slice_
 		      invalid_sem(&slice_ent[i].sem2) || invalid_sem(&slice_ent[i].sem3))
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		if (slice_ent[i].offset + slice_ent[i].size > total_size)
+		if (check_add_overflow(slice_ent[i].offset, slice_ent[i].size, &total) ||
+		    total > total_size)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-- 
2.47.2